> > > > > """

Ideal Weight Range

Compare four classic formulas side by side — Robinson, Miller, Devine, and Hamwi. See how they differ and where your current weight falls on each scale.

Advertisement

Your Details

All data stays in your browser — we never see it.

How It Works

Robinson (1983): Updated Devine formula. Accounts for frame size better than the original.

Miller (1983): Based on median weights from Metropolitan Life Insurance tables. Tends to be slightly lower.

Devine (1974): The classic formula used in pharmacology for drug dosing. Simple but does not account for frame size.

Hamwi (1964): Based on actuarial data. Often gives the highest values, especially for taller individuals.

Note: These formulas were developed decades ago on specific populations. They do not account for muscle mass, ethnicity, age-related changes, or modern body composition norms. Use them as reference points, not targets.

About These Formulas

Robinson (1983): Updated Devine formula. Accounts for frame size better than the original.

Miller (1983): Based on median weights from Metropolitan Life Insurance tables. Tends to be slightly lower.

Devine (1974): The classic formula used in pharmacology for drug dosing. Simple but doesn't account for frame size.

Hamwi (1964): Based on actuarial data. Often gives the highest values, especially for taller individuals.

Note: These formulas were developed decades ago on specific populations. They don't account for muscle mass, ethnicity, age-related changes, or modern body composition norms. Use them as reference points, not targets.

Advertisement
Advertisement